0 Comentários
Vantagens da equipe Ancient (M2)
Registros Ancient
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:34s01:26s
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:24s01:26s
USP mortas no mapa
31.6074
Dano por USP (média/rodada)
14.94.7
Fumaça lançada no mapa
1714.6931
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
16.64
Fumaça lançada no mapa
1614.6931
Tec-9 kills em um mapa
21.3023
Assistências em um mapa
9.014.4098
Info
Map Analysis of Perseverance vs E-Xolos LAZER by the Bo3.gg Team
E-Xolos LAZER on Ancient Analysis
E-Xolos LAZER demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for E-Xolos LAZER on Ancient were tatazin, who contributed 19 kills, and w1, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7324 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, E-Xolos LAZER held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Perseverance on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Perseverance, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Perseverance on Ancient included Sandman, who contributed 14 kills, and Andrew, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5240 total damage, Perseverance couldn't prevent E-Xolos LAZER from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Perseverance struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários