4 Comentários
73
76
28
-3
346
12:12
17
1
-5%
Vantagens da equipe Dust II (M2)
Registros Dust II
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
02:02s00:36s
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
8328
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
01:53s00:36s
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
7328
Fumaça lançada no mapa
2214.3232
USP mortas no mapa
61.5986
Dano por USP (média/rodada)
154.8
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
11.84.2
Danos (total/rodada)
43273
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
36361010
Info
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs Into the Breach by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Dust II Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Dust II were Jambo, who contributed 20 kills, and jackasmo, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8602 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Into the Breach on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Into the Breach, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Into the Breach on Dust II included Keoz, who contributed 20 kills, and sinnopsyy, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8315 total damage, Into the Breach couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Into the Breach struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
4 Comentários