0 Comentários
65
71
21
-6
317
10:12
16
3
-10%
70
67
26
+3
367
12:10
16
0
+2%
Vantagens da equipe Dust II (M1)
Registros Dust II
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
11.33.4
Eco ganha compra integral
1
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
41001011
Clutch (adversários)
3
Morto por colega de equipe
1
Dano HE (total/rodada)
13226.1
Duração do flash numa rodada (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Duração do flash numa rodada (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Duração do flash numa rodada (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Info
Map Analysis of PARIVISION vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
PARIVISION on Dust II Analysis
PARIVISION demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for PARIVISION on Dust II were TRAVIS, who contributed 15 kills, and nota, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 6980 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, PARIVISION held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Dust II included Cjoffo, who contributed 21 kills, and simke, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8080 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent PARIVISION from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários