0 Comentários
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
escalação
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Inferno
100%
Overpass
100%
Mirage
100%
Nuke
86%
Anubis
75%
Ancient
22%
Vertigo
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
100%
1
1
Mirage
100%
2
1
Nuke
0%
0
2
Anubis
0%
0
4
Ancient
100%
1
2
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Inferno
100%
3
3
Overpass
0%
2
4
Mirage
0%
0
8
Nuke
86%
7
1
Anubis
75%
4
0
Ancient
78%
9
0
Vertigo
67%
6
1
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- VVVVV
- VVlVV
Info
Match analysis of Nigma Galaxy vs Fluxo Demons by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Nigma Galaxy and Fluxo Demons, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by Fluxo Demons. The MVP of this match was poppins.
Fluxo Demons analytics
The team Fluxo Demons secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fluxo Demons were poppins contributed 20 kills and julih contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7959 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fluxo Demons held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nigma Galaxy analytics
The team Nigma Galaxy managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nigma Galaxy were vilga contributed 13 kills and twenty3 contributed 13 kills. 6629 of total damage by Nigma Galaxy could not prevent Fluxo Demons from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nigma Galaxy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários