NAVI Junior Placar

+/-

PONTUAÇÃO DO MAPA

29

18

2

+11

98

4:3

7

1

Anubis7.1

8.3

+12%

66

47

15

+19

132

9:6

17

1

Anubis7.1

8.3

+28%

54

50

11

+4

113

6:1

18

1

Anubis8.8

7.7

+24%

53

58

35

-5

124

10:7

13

0

Anubis6.3

7.6

+9%

20

23

12

-3

88

6:2

6

0

Ancient6.7

6.7

-3%

43

47

15

-4

88

10:14

12

1

Anubis5.3

6.3

+5%

20

18

3

+2

72

5:5

6

1

Ancient6.3

6.3

0%

38

50

12

-12

82

5:6

10

0

Anubis6.7

6.1

-3%

12

22

5

-10

52

2:0

4

0

Ancient5.1

5.1

-15%

9

18

3

-9

44

1:2

1

0

Ancient4.5

4.5

-18%

Total

344

351

113

-7

892

58:46

94

5

Ancient6.5

6.7

+4%

Apogee Placar

+/-

PONTUAÇÃO DO MAPA

21

16

6

+5

71

3:3

5

0

Anubis4.7

6.7

+2%

22

19

9

+3

86

4:6

5

0

Ancient6.4

6.4

+5%

24

19

6

+5

86

3:1

7

0

Anubis5.1

6.4

+9%

18

16

2

+2

60

1:2

4

0

Anubis5.9

6.2

-6%

14

20

4

-6

52

1:6

2

0

Anubis5.5

5.5

-11%

Total

99

90

27

+9

354

12:18

23

0

Ancient5.9

6.2

0%

SkinClub Worldwide
score predict & Analytics Insights
2 - 0
Resultado
2 - 1
1 - 2
0 - 2
Vantagem das equipes

Mapas

Pontuação

7.1

6.2

Anubis1.6

Rodadas vencedoras

45

35

Anubis6

Kills

345

349

Anubis29

Danos

38.67K

37.8K

Anubis2211

Economia

1.73M

1.73M

Anubis88550

Registros Partida

Registro/Tempo/Mapa

Val/M

Feito por

Rival

Rodada rápida (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:24s01:55s

Pontuação do jogador (rodada)

  •  Ancient

55891010

Pontuação do jogador (rodada)

  •  Ancient

35011010

Pontuação do jogador (rodada)

  •  Ancient

37681010

Aces do jogador

  •  Ancient

1

Múltiplos kills x-

  •  Ancient

4

Múltiplos kills x-

  •  Ancient

4

Clutch (adversários)

  •  Ancient

4

Clutch (adversários)

  •  Ancient

2

Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )

  •  Nuke

00:04s01:25s

Escalação
escalação
escalação
Escolhas e banimentos

No momento, não há informações relacionadas a esse mapa draft
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses

Inferno

100%

Vertigo

75%

Anubis

48%

Dust II

37%

Mirage

14%

Ancient

11%

Nuke

6%

Últimos 5 mapas

Inferno

100%

2

8

fb
fb
V
fb
V

Vertigo

25%

8

4

l
l
l
fb
fb

Anubis

81%

21

0

V
V
V
V

Dust II

77%

13

1

V
V
V
V
V

Mirage

64%

25

2

V
V
V
l

Ancient

78%

36

0

l
V
V
l
V

Nuke

44%

16

3

l
V
V
V

Últimos 5 mapas

Inferno

0%

0

3

fb
fb
fb

Vertigo

100%

5

0

V
V
V
V
V

Anubis

33%

3

2

l
V

Dust II

40%

5

1

l
V
fb
l
V

Mirage

50%

4

2

l
l
V
V

Ancient

67%

6

0

V
V
l
V
V

Nuke

50%

4

0

V
l
V
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
As equipes não se enfrentaram nos últimos 6 meses
Partidas anteriores
Info
Match analysis of NAVI Junior vs Apogee by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between NAVI Junior and Apogee, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, Anubis, and victory was secured by NAVI Junior. The MVP of this match was Krabeni.


NAVI Junior analytics

The team NAVI Junior secured 45 out of 80 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Nuke, Anubis. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.


The standout players for NAVI Junior were Krabeni contributed 29 kills and Krabeni contributed 66 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 38566 overall damage.


On the defensive side, NAVI Junior held their ground firmly, successfully defending 24 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


Apogee analytics

The team Apogee managed to secure 35 out of 80 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for Apogee were POLO contributed 21 kills and swiz contributed 22 kills. 10629 of total damage by Apogee could not prevent NAVI Junior from securing the victory


On the defensive side, Apogee struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comentários
Por data