0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Pontuação
6.6
5.7
Vertigo2.1
Rodadas vencedoras
32
19
Vertigo10
Kills
197
158
Vertigo38
Danos
21.42K
17.84K
Vertigo3379
Economia
1.1M
966.65K
Vertigo118900
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Tec-9 kills em um mapa
41.3055
Danos por Tec-9 (média/rodada)
11.13.4
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
6.82
Tiros (total/rodada)
8316
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
36011012
Danos (total/rodada)
40073
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
43371012
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
37301012
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Info
Match analysis of Mythic vs Axolotls by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Mythic and Axolotls, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Mythic. The MVP of this match was hate.
Mythic analytics
The team Mythic secured 32 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Vertigo. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Mythic were hate contributed 42 kills and ERIC contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21419 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Mythic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Axolotls analytics
The team Axolotls managed to secure 19 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Axolotls were Elk contributed 31 kills and Tender contributed 37 kills. 17845 of total damage by Axolotls could not prevent Mythic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Axolotls struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários