0 Comentários
108
85
32
+23
396
16:14
28
0
+10%
Vantagens da equipe Inferno (M2)
Registros Inferno
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
6.42
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
24.93.4
Galil kills no mapa
61.8064
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
20.45.6
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
01:49s00:39s
Tiros (total/rodada)
9616
Tiros (total/rodada)
11016
Tiros (total/rodada)
12816
Aces do jogador
1
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Info
Map Analysis of Lyngby Vikings vs Copenhagen Flames by the Bo3.gg Team
Lyngby Vikings on Inferno Analysis
Lyngby Vikings demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Inferno were WolfY, who contributed 30 kills, and maNkz, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11879 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Copenhagen Flames on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Copenhagen Flames, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Inferno included roeJ, who contributed 23 kills, and Zyphon, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9621 total damage, Copenhagen Flames couldn't prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Copenhagen Flames struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários