0 Comentários
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Assistências em um mapa
11.444.4098
Negócios em um mapa
11.443.4638
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
36211011
Danos (total/rodada)
41573
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
35381011
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Nuke
67%
Inferno
38%
Dust II
33%
Vertigo
25%
Ancient
23%
Anubis
9%
Mirage
4%
Últimos 5 mapas
Nuke
67%
9
1
Inferno
0%
1
4
Dust II
100%
2
2
Vertigo
0%
2
7
Ancient
15%
13
1
Anubis
53%
17
0
Mirage
50%
4
2
Últimos 5 mapas
Nuke
0%
1
10
Inferno
38%
8
4
Dust II
67%
3
0
Vertigo
25%
12
3
Ancient
38%
34
0
Anubis
44%
25
3
Mirage
54%
28
0
Info
Match analysis of LEON vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LEON and NOM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Dust II, and victory was secured by LEON. The MVP of this match was Raijin.
LEON analytics
The team LEON secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Dust II. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LEON were Raijin contributed 20 kills and facecrack contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8149 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LEON held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NOM analytics
The team NOM managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NOM were Schwarz contributed 17 kills and dan1 contributed 15 kills. 7052 of total damage by NOM could not prevent LEON from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NOM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários