0 Comentários
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
escalação
Início
Início
Início
Início
Início
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Ancient
56%
Overpass
55%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
46%
Vertigo
28%
Mirage
17%
Anubis
15%
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
83%
6
2
Overpass
0%
1
9
Inferno
50%
4
5
Nuke
29%
7
1
Vertigo
14%
7
3
Mirage
60%
5
0
Anubis
31%
13
1
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
27%
22
5
Overpass
55%
11
8
Inferno
0%
1
28
Nuke
75%
16
3
Vertigo
42%
12
5
Mirage
43%
23
3
Anubis
46%
13
11
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- VVVlV
- lVlVl
Info
Match analysis of Lazer Cats vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Lazer Cats and AGO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Anubis, Ancient, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was Burmylov.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 52 out of 93 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 11 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were DEPRESHN contributed 81 kills and tAk contributed 67 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 35549 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 28 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lazer Cats analytics
The team Lazer Cats managed to secure 41 out of 93 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lazer Cats were Burmylov contributed 83 kills and 7oX1C contributed 64 kills. 33443 of total damage by Lazer Cats could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lazer Cats struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários