0 Comentários
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Overpass
73%
Ancient
64%
Inferno
61%
Nuke
53%
Mirage
45%
Dust II
33%
Vertigo
7%
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
73%
33
2
Ancient
64%
11
32
Inferno
61%
33
6
Nuke
53%
36
6
Mirage
45%
29
13
Dust II
33%
9
37
Vertigo
43%
14
27
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Inferno
0%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
2
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
50%
2
1
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- lVlVl
- lll
Info
Match analysis of Into the Breach vs Legates by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Into the Breach and Legates, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Into the Breach. The MVP of this match was RuStY.
Into the Breach analytics
The team Into the Breach secured 0 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Into the Breach were RuStY contributed 24 kills and CYPHER contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9809 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Into the Breach held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Legates analytics
The team Legates managed to secure 26 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Legates were Rayman contributed 26 kills and DagThePimple contributed 19 kills. 8283 of total damage by Legates could not prevent Into the Breach from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Legates struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários