0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
escalação
Início
Início
Início
Início
Início
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Overpass
74%
Ancient
64%
Inferno
61%
Nuke
54%
Vertigo
43%
Mirage
41%
Dust II
25%
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
74%
34
2
Ancient
64%
11
32
Inferno
61%
33
6
Nuke
54%
37
6
Vertigo
43%
14
27
Mirage
41%
27
13
Dust II
25%
8
37
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
Info
Match analysis of Into the Breach vs eMasters by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Into the Breach and eMasters, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Into the Breach. The MVP of this match was draken.
Into the Breach analytics
The team Into the Breach secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Into the Breach were draken contributed 24 kills and Adam9130 contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10291 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Into the Breach held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
eMasters analytics
The team eMasters managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for eMasters were eMy contributed 18 kills and husky contributed 19 kills. 9296 of total damage by eMasters could not prevent Into the Breach from securing the victory
On the defensive side, eMasters struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários