0 Comentários
96
169
15
-73
285
14:24
21
1
Vertigo5.1
-11%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Nuke
100%
Mirage
100%
Dust II
88%
Vertigo
63%
Overpass
50%
Inferno
0%
Ancient
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Nuke
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Nuke
100%
5
0
Mirage
100%
15
1
Dust II
88%
8
3
Vertigo
63%
8
4
Overpass
50%
4
4
Inferno
0%
0
13
Ancient
0%
0
5
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- l
- lVVVV
Info
Match analysis of Parabellum fe vs FURIA fe by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Parabellum fe and FURIA fe, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by FURIA fe. The MVP of this match was Olga.
FURIA fe analytics
The team FURIA fe secured 20 out of 38 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FURIA fe were Olga contributed 41 kills and GaBi contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17480 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FURIA fe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Parabellum fe analytics
The team Parabellum fe managed to secure 18 out of 38 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Parabellum fe were Vii contributed 24 kills and armk4m contributed 20 kills. 10887 of total damage by Parabellum fe could not prevent FURIA fe from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Parabellum fe struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários