0 Comentários
38
74
4
-36
229
5:17
6
0
Dust II4.4
-24%
Vantagem das equipes
Pontuação
4.4
6.4
Dust II2
Rodadas vencedoras
6
16
Dust II10
Kills
41
94
Dust II53
Danos
5.03K
9.65K
Dust II4621
Economia
324.3K
492K
Dust II167700
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Vertigo
62%
Inferno
61%
Ancient
60%
Mirage
59%
Nuke
53%
Dust II
47%
Overpass
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
2
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
62%
13
10
Inferno
61%
28
4
Ancient
60%
5
9
Mirage
59%
22
4
Nuke
53%
19
2
Dust II
47%
17
3
Overpass
0%
1
22
Info
Match analysis of Lagom vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Lagom and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Nexus. The MVP of this match was XELLOW.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus secured 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nexus were XELLOW contributed 22 kills and BTN contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7576 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nexus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lagom analytics
The team Lagom managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lagom were xicoz contributed 12 kills and powerdy contributed 10 kills. 5032 of total damage by Lagom could not prevent Nexus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lagom struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários