0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Pontuação
5.5
6.7
Inferno1.2
Rodadas vencedoras
9
13
Inferno4
Kills
68
83
Inferno15
Danos
7.21K
8.78K
Inferno1565
Economia
434.7K
439.8K
Inferno5100
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Nuke
87%
Vertigo
75%
Inferno
54%
Mirage
G
44%
Overpass
39%
Anubis
G
27%
Ancient
15%
Últimos 5 mapas
Nuke
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Inferno
0%
2
4
Mirage
100%
1
1
Overpass
0%
1
2
Anubis
67%
3
0
Ancient
50%
2
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Nuke
87%
15
1
Vertigo
75%
24
2
Inferno
54%
13
12
Mirage
56%
9
23
Overpass
39%
18
12
Anubis
40%
5
36
Ancient
65%
31
2
Info
Match analysis of Grindas vs MOUZ NXT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Grindas and MOUZ NXT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by MOUZ NXT. The MVP of this match was PR.
MOUZ NXT analytics
The team MOUZ NXT secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MOUZ NXT were PR contributed 21 kills and sirah contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8775 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MOUZ NXT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Grindas analytics
The team Grindas managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Grindas were BaGyZ contributed 15 kills and Prochas contributed 16 kills. 7210 of total damage by Grindas could not prevent MOUZ NXT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Grindas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários