0 Comentários
Vantagens da equipe Inferno (M1)
Registros Inferno
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Overpass
A
71%
Nuke
67%
Ancient
60%
Mirage
A
44%
Inferno
17%
Dust II
A
12%
Vertigo
3%
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
0%
3
13
Nuke
67%
6
4
Ancient
60%
5
5
Mirage
0%
1
20
Inferno
60%
15
0
Dust II
38%
8
7
Vertigo
43%
7
8
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
71%
7
0
Nuke
0%
0
16
Ancient
0%
2
3
Mirage
44%
9
0
Inferno
43%
7
2
Dust II
50%
2
6
Vertigo
40%
5
11
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- llVll
- lllll
Info
Map Analysis of FunPlus Phoenix vs AURA by the Bo3.gg Team
FunPlus Phoenix on Inferno Analysis
FunPlus Phoenix demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for FunPlus Phoenix on Inferno were Farlig, who contributed 19 kills, and STYKO, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9237 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, FunPlus Phoenix held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
AURA on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AURA, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for AURA on Inferno included bobeksde, who contributed 18 kills, and zen, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8250 total damage, AURA couldn't prevent FunPlus Phoenix from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, AURA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários