0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
01:27s00:38s
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
6829
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
01:41s00:38s
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
6529
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
19.85.7
Danos (total/rodada)
50073
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
37311011
Aces do jogador
1
Clutch (adversários)
2
Morto por colega de equipe
1
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Vertigo
69%
Mirage
67%
Anubis
30%
Nuke
17%
Overpass
12%
Ancient
8%
Inferno
7%
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
11%
9
14
Mirage
0%
0
28
Anubis
30%
10
14
Nuke
50%
4
13
Overpass
62%
13
6
Ancient
59%
17
1
Inferno
60%
10
12
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
80%
5
0
Mirage
67%
3
4
Anubis
0%
0
10
Nuke
33%
3
4
Overpass
50%
2
0
Ancient
67%
3
8
Inferno
67%
3
1
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and AMKAL, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was icy.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were afro contributed 14 kills and MATYS contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8920 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AMKAL were icy contributed 20 kills and Forester contributed 17 kills. 8193 of total damage by AMKAL could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários