0 Comentários
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Deagle kills no mapa
41.6964
Danos por Deagle (média/rodada)
22.85.4
AK47 damage (média/rodada)
71.725.3
Granadas de isca lançadas
31.291
AK47 kills no mapa
136.732
AK47 damage (média/rodada)
64.225.3
Granadas de isca lançadas
41.291
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
36351012
Tiros (total/rodada)
11416
Clutch (adversários)
2
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Dust II
Inferno
Overpass
Vertigo
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
Inferno
Overpass
Vertigo
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
Inferno
Overpass
Vertigo
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Info
Match analysis of Fiend vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Fiend and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, and victory was secured by Fiend. The MVP of this match was dream3r.
Fiend analytics
The team Fiend secured 32 out of 47 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 15 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fiend were dream3r contributed 42 kills and REDSTAR contributed 30 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16672 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fiend held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint managed to secure 15 out of 47 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Endpoint were CRUC1AL contributed 33 kills and Surreal contributed 28 kills. 16231 of total damage by Endpoint could not prevent Fiend from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários