0 Comentários
Escalação
escalação
escalação
Início
Início
Início
Início
Início
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Dust II
80%
Ancient
33%
Mirage
27%
Vertigo
3%
Inferno
0%
Overpass
0%
Nuke
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
80%
15
2
Ancient
0%
1
62
Mirage
64%
22
16
Vertigo
55%
33
7
Inferno
50%
32
18
Overpass
56%
16
21
Nuke
60%
25
18
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
0%
0
53
Ancient
33%
18
20
Mirage
37%
27
12
Vertigo
58%
19
6
Inferno
50%
16
10
Overpass
56%
18
16
Nuke
60%
25
2
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- lVlll
- VVlVl
Info
Map Analysis of Eternal Fire vs Dignitas by the Bo3.gg Team
Eternal Fire on Vertigo Analysis
Eternal Fire demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire on Vertigo were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Dignitas on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Dignitas, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Dignitas on Vertigo included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Dignitas couldn't prevent Eternal Fire from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Dignitas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários