0 Comentários
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
escalação
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Vertigo
67%
Ancient
50%
Inferno
38%
Dust II
29%
Overpass
17%
Mirage
11%
Nuke
10%
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
0%
1
52
Ancient
50%
22
18
Inferno
62%
55
2
Dust II
40%
30
8
Overpass
50%
26
18
Mirage
58%
50
3
Nuke
40%
20
17
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
67%
3
8
Ancient
0%
3
11
Inferno
24%
21
1
Dust II
69%
13
3
Overpass
33%
3
11
Mirage
47%
30
1
Nuke
50%
16
2
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- lVVVV
- VlVlV
Info
Match analysis of Enterprise vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Enterprise and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Enterprise. The MVP of this match was h4rn.
Enterprise analytics
The team Enterprise secured 0 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Enterprise were h4rn contributed 34 kills and Blytz contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9499 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Enterprise held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 21 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were fajkus contributed 11 kills and nEMANHA contributed 12 kills. 6799 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent Enterprise from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários