0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Galil kills no mapa
41.8171
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Rodada rápida (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Clutch (adversários)
2
Clutch (adversários)
3
Clutch (adversários)
2
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Ancient
69%
Mirage
59%
Vertigo
57%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
50%
Anubis
E
49%
Dust II
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
69%
52
19
Mirage
59%
34
16
Vertigo
57%
37
15
Inferno
50%
2
59
Nuke
50%
48
5
Anubis
51%
39
23
Dust II
0%
2
0
Info
Match analysis of ENRAGE vs Permitta by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ENRAGE and Permitta, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by Permitta. The MVP of this match was maaryy.
Permitta analytics
The team Permitta secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Permitta were maaryy contributed 18 kills and morelz contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8984 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Permitta held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ENRAGE analytics
The team ENRAGE managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ENRAGE were rafftu contributed 14 kills and hazza contributed 16 kills. 8045 of total damage by ENRAGE could not prevent Permitta from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ENRAGE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários