0 Comentários
95
95
23
0
360
13:15
24
1
-2%
Vantagens da equipe Inferno (M1)
Registros Inferno
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
HE kills no mapa
41.127
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
13.23.4
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
6.32
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
02:02s00:39s
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
8130
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
13.43.4
AK47 damage (média/rodada)
61.525.3
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
01:49s00:39s
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
13.43.4
Eco ganha compra integral
1
Info
Map Analysis of ECLOT vs Copenhagen Flames by the Bo3.gg Team
Copenhagen Flames on Inferno Analysis
Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Inferno were raalz, who contributed 29 kills, and birdfromsky, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10453 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ECLOT on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ECLOT, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ECLOT on Inferno included nbqq, who contributed 27 kills, and Valencio, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10520 total damage, ECLOT couldn't prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários