0 Comentários
25
52
5
-27
239
6:7
5
0
0%
Vantagens da equipe Anubis (M1)
Escalação
escalação
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Dust II
100%
Mirage
60%
Nuke
58%
Ancient
56%
Inferno
L
50%
Vertigo
50%
Anubis
23%
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
100%
1
17
Mirage
60%
42
1
Nuke
58%
24
5
Ancient
56%
66
0
Inferno
50%
14
9
Vertigo
50%
10
4
Anubis
56%
25
2
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
0%
4
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
33%
9
0
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- lVVVl
- lllll
Info
Map Analysis of CPH Wolves vs LOADING by the Bo3.gg Team
CPH Wolves on Anubis Analysis
CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 13 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CPH Wolves on Anubis were Szejn, who contributed 12 kills, and BøghmagiC, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 5200 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
LOADING on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for LOADING, as they managed to secure 0 out of 13 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for LOADING on Anubis included Revol, who contributed 8 kills, and HippoV, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3110 total damage, LOADING couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, LOADING struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários