0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
- Iniciante
escalação
Início
Início
Início
Início
Início
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Dust II
25%
Vertigo
19%
Mirage
11%
Nuke
6%
Overpass
5%
Inferno
4%
Ancient
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
47%
17
0
Vertigo
75%
4
8
Mirage
69%
26
0
Nuke
47%
15
1
Overpass
45%
20
4
Inferno
42%
19
4
Ancient
0%
2
10
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
72%
25
3
Vertigo
56%
16
4
Mirage
58%
33
4
Nuke
53%
17
5
Overpass
50%
24
1
Inferno
38%
13
10
Ancient
0%
3
17
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- lVlVl
- Vllll
Info
Match analysis of Budapest Five vs OneTap by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Budapest Five and OneTap, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Budapest Five. The MVP of this match was fleav.
Budapest Five analytics
The team Budapest Five secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Budapest Five were fleav contributed 26 kills and Aaron contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8903 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Budapest Five held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
OneTap analytics
The team OneTap managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for OneTap were MoDo contributed 16 kills and smekk contributed 16 kills. 6167 of total damage by OneTap could not prevent Budapest Five from securing the victory
On the defensive side, OneTap struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários