0 Comentários
Vantagens da equipe Inferno (M1)
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Mirage
60%
Ancient
B
56%
Dust II
B
50%
Vertigo
50%
Overpass
20%
Nuke
10%
Inferno
B
3%
Últimos 5 mapas
Mirage
40%
5
6
Ancient
56%
9
1
Dust II
50%
8
1
Vertigo
0%
0
10
Overpass
50%
4
1
Nuke
40%
5
3
Inferno
50%
12
1
Últimos 5 mapas
Mirage
100%
3
6
Ancient
0%
2
3
Dust II
0%
0
7
Vertigo
50%
10
2
Overpass
70%
10
1
Nuke
50%
10
1
Inferno
47%
15
0
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- VVlll
- VVVVV
Info
Map Analysis of Beyond Possible vs EKO by the Bo3.gg Team
EKO on Inferno Analysis
EKO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for EKO on Inferno were Tadpole, who contributed 23 kills, and Gizmy, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10862 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, EKO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Beyond Possible on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Beyond Possible, as they managed to secure 29 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Beyond Possible on Inferno included SPELLAN, who contributed 22 kills, and rafftu, who added 24 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11117 total damage, Beyond Possible couldn't prevent EKO from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Beyond Possible struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários