0 Comentários
99
114
25
-15
384
13:17
26
3
Ancient5.8
-3%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Mirage
88%
Dust II
60%
Ancient
51%
Overpass
43%
Nuke
29%
Vertigo
10%
Inferno
7%
Últimos 5 mapas
Mirage
0%
2
1
Dust II
0%
1
2
Ancient
80%
5
0
Overpass
57%
7
0
Nuke
29%
7
0
Vertigo
50%
8
0
Inferno
57%
7
1
Últimos 5 mapas
Mirage
88%
8
0
Dust II
60%
5
3
Ancient
29%
7
5
Overpass
100%
1
1
Nuke
0%
1
3
Vertigo
60%
5
2
Inferno
50%
12
2
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- llVlV
- VVlll
Info
Match analysis of BakS vs Strive in chaos by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BakS and Strive in chaos, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by BakS. The MVP of this match was Danistzz.
BakS analytics
The team BakS secured 30 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BakS were Danistzz contributed 32 kills and RuFire contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12084 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BakS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Strive in chaos analytics
The team Strive in chaos managed to secure 0 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Strive in chaos were Maki contributed 29 kills and CHANKY contributed 19 kills. 11534 of total damage by Strive in chaos could not prevent BakS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Strive in chaos struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários