0 Comentários
100
84
29
+16
416
11:15
24
5
+8%
Vantagens da equipe Dust II (M2)
Registros Dust II
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
AWP kills no mapa
236.5798
Danos por AWP (média/rodada)
71.821.6
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
6630
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
01:32s00:39s
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
8130
Kills em um mapa
3717.5558
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
35081012
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
44621012
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
37441012
Danos (total/rodada)
40073
Info
Map Analysis of Bad News Bears vs Big Chillin by the Bo3.gg Team
Bad News Bears on Dust II Analysis
Bad News Bears demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 15 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Bad News Bears on Dust II were Junior, who contributed 37 kills, and Swisher, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10406 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Bad News Bears held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Big Chillin on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Big Chillin, as they managed to secure 10 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Big Chillin on Dust II included hate, who contributed 22 kills, and droid, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9173 total damage, Big Chillin couldn't prevent Bad News Bears from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Big Chillin struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários