1 Comentários
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
M4A4 kills no mapa
15.11113.4961
Porcentagem de tiros na cabeça
44%15%
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
19.43.4
USP mortas no mapa
7.55561.6074
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
15.83.4
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
12.72
Danos por M4A1 (média/rodada)
56.216.3
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
98.222229
Galil kills no mapa
7.55561.8171
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
22.25.8
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Vertigo
47%
Ancient
35%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
17%
Inferno
15%
Overpass
10%
Anubis
4%
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
47%
15
15
Ancient
58%
36
3
Nuke
0%
0
61
Mirage
33%
27
15
Inferno
48%
21
16
Overpass
40%
15
23
Anubis
58%
26
7
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
0%
0
11
Ancient
23%
13
3
Nuke
33%
3
7
Mirage
50%
6
1
Inferno
33%
3
2
Overpass
50%
2
6
Anubis
54%
13
3
Info
Match analysis of Apeks vs GUN5 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Apeks and GUN5, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Apeks. The MVP of this match was .
Apeks analytics
The team Apeks secured 0 out of 9 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Apeks were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Apeks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 managed to secure 0 out of 9 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GUN5 were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by GUN5 could not prevent Apeks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
1 Comentários