0 Komentarze
86
72
28
+14
424
15:7
18
3
+14%
Przewaga drużyn Inferno (M1)
Składy
Skład
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Ancient
71%
Dust II
67%
Anubis
50%
Overpass
29%
Mirage
23%
Nuke
19%
Vertigo
6%
Inferno
1%
Ostatnie 5 map
Ancient
0%
0
31
Dust II
67%
3
0
Anubis
50%
12
4
Overpass
54%
13
5
Mirage
48%
31
1
Nuke
48%
31
1
Vertigo
56%
16
12
Inferno
48%
31
7
Ostatnie 5 map
Ancient
71%
7
2
Dust II
0%
2
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Overpass
25%
4
3
Mirage
25%
4
2
Nuke
67%
6
3
Vertigo
50%
14
0
Inferno
47%
15
0
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- wllwl
- lwlwl
Informacja
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Atlantic by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were nEMANHA, who contributed 20 kills, and simke, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9335 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Atlantic on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Atlantic, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Atlantic on Inferno included Zanto, who contributed 17 kills, and Vster, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7898 total damage, Atlantic couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Atlantic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze