0 Komentarze
72
68
19
+4
369
10:12
17
2
+1%
Przewaga drużyn Inferno (M1)
Rekordy Inferno
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Rzucenie dymówki na mapie
2014.5022
Obrażenia od AK-47(śr./runda)
57.225.2
Obrażenia od granatu (avg/round)
13.63.4
Czas trwania oślepienia flashem na mapie (sec)
01:17s00:36s
Zabójstwa za pomocą USP na mapie
41.6027
Obrażenia od USP (avg/round)
16.84.8
Strzały (total/round)
10916
Strzały (total/round)
9816
Wynik gracza (runda)
37391010
Multikill x-
4
Informacja
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were simke, who contributed 17 kills, and nEMANHA, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8114 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno included HEAP, who contributed 17 kills, and Peppzor, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7372 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze