0 Komentarze
108
100
28
+8
384
18:12
25
3
Mirage6.2
0%
Przewaga drużyn
RekordyMecz
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Składy
Skład
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Skład
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Overpass
52%
Vertigo
39%
Mirage
20%
Dust II
19%
Inferno
19%
Nuke
3%
Ancient
0%
Ostatnie 5 map
Overpass
52%
21
0
Vertigo
64%
11
7
Mirage
67%
24
3
Dust II
69%
13
6
Inferno
50%
6
12
Nuke
42%
12
4
Ancient
0%
1
17
Ostatnie 5 map
Overpass
0%
1
3
Vertigo
25%
4
5
Mirage
47%
19
1
Dust II
50%
10
1
Inferno
31%
13
0
Nuke
45%
11
2
Ancient
0%
0
4
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- wwwll
- wllll
Informacja
Match analysis of OneTap vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between OneTap and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was smekk.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 23 kills and nEMANHA contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11505 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
OneTap analytics
The team OneTap managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for OneTap were smekk contributed 28 kills and swiiffter contributed 25 kills. 10894 of total damage by OneTap could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, OneTap struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze