0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Dust II (M1)
Składy
Skład
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Vertigo
63%
Ancient
60%
Mirage
58%
Inferno
L
54%
Dust II
43%
Anubis
27%
Nuke
0%
Ostatnie 5 map
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Dust II
0%
3
0
Anubis
38%
8
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Ostatnie 5 map
Vertigo
63%
38
9
Ancient
60%
75
4
Mirage
58%
59
10
Inferno
46%
35
19
Dust II
43%
21
17
Anubis
65%
57
10
Nuke
0%
0
71
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- lllll
- lllwl
Informacja
Map Analysis of LOADING vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Dust II Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Dust II were Jambo, who contributed 24 kills, and s-chilla, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9228 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
LOADING on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for LOADING, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for LOADING on Dust II included SIXER, who contributed 16 kills, and Yeneurs, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7327 total damage, LOADING couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, LOADING struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze