0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Inferno (M1)
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Nuke
67%
Overpass
33%
Mirage
32%
Dust II
28%
Ancient
25%
Vertigo
8%
Inferno
2%
Ostatnie 5 map
Nuke
33%
12
10
Overpass
60%
10
16
Mirage
76%
29
1
Dust II
74%
27
1
Ancient
0%
1
31
Vertigo
46%
13
8
Inferno
54%
26
3
Ostatnie 5 map
Nuke
100%
2
1
Overpass
27%
11
0
Mirage
44%
9
3
Dust II
46%
13
1
Ancient
25%
4
1
Vertigo
38%
8
1
Inferno
52%
21
1
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- wwlww
- llwll
Informacja
Map Analysis of Iron Branch vs cowana by the Bo3.gg Team
cowana on Inferno Analysis
cowana demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for cowana on Inferno were stfN, who contributed 19 kills, and Thomas, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8721 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, cowana held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Iron Branch on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Iron Branch, as they managed to secure 0 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Iron Branch on Inferno included sad, who contributed 14 kills, and 1mpact, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5193 total damage, Iron Branch couldn't prevent cowana from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Iron Branch struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze