Ganginho, who was previously banned by ESIC for 322, made a bold statement during a stream with Lobanjica. He accused the British organization Reason Gaming of match-fixing. However, in response to these accusations, Reason Gaming released an official statement denying all of Ganginho's claims and described them as an attempt to draw attention.

Esports has repeatedly faced accusations of unfair play and match-fixing. In the past, such scandals have ruined players' careers and led to lifetime bans. Now, the British team is in the spotlight, and judging by the resonance, this could lead to serious consequences.

Reason Gaming's Statement

After the stream with Lobanjica where the accusations were made, Reason Gaming quickly responded by publishing an official comment on X. It stated that they have initiated an internal investigation to verify the truthfulness of the information. Representatives of the organization noted that such accusations are not uncommon in esports, and if Ganginho truly wanted to reveal the truth, he would have provided evidence, including the names of people involved in betting. However, they claimed the streamer was merely using well-known team names to gain attention.

We are aware of the accusations against our CS team and are conducting a full investigation. Esports is no stranger to such accusations, and we take them very seriously. If this person truly wanted to "tell all," he would have published the names of the people who provided this betting information so more effective actions could be taken. Instead, he is simply using the names of well-known organizations to gain more influence and fame for himself.

Reason Gaming

Following Ganginho's accusations, Reason Gaming faced a reputational hit. Now, they aim not only to refute the allegations but also to prove their integrity to the community.

This incident once again raises the important issue of integrity in esports. Match-fixing is a serious problem that threatens the integrity of competitions. Regardless of the investigation's outcome, it underscores the need for stricter control over betting and transparency in the industry.