Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Vertigo (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

13

3

+8

76

1:1

5

0

6.4

+20%

15

16

4

-1

73

2:1

3

0

5.9

-2%

12

15

4

-3

61

2:1

2

0

5.3

-8%

11

13

3

-2

46

4:4

4

0

5.2

-20%

11

17

10

-6

65

2:5

3

0

5.0

-18%

Total

70

74

24

-4

321

11:12

17

0

5.6

-5%

TSM Scoreboard Vertigo (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

15

4

+4

74

8:5

4

0

6.6

+10%

16

10

7

+6

75

0:0

4

1

6.4

+20%

18

14

1

+4

66

2:1

4

0

6.1

-2%

13

17

5

-4

64

2:5

3

0

5.1

-6%

6

15

9

-9

50

0:0

0

0

4.6

-32%

Total

72

71

26

+1

329

12:11

15

1

5.8

-2%

Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs TSM by the Bo3.gg Team

TSM on Vertigo Analysis

TSM demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for TSM on Vertigo were CYPHER, who contributed 19 kills, and interz, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 7904 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Vertigo, TSM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Vertigo Analysis

Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Vertigo included Cjoffo, who contributed 21 kills, and simke, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7697 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent TSM from securing victory on Vertigo


On the defensive side of Vertigo, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date