0 Comments
398
402
68
-4
364
64:55
93
5
Nuke6
+1%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
80%
Nuke
57%
Ancient
44%
Overpass
15%
Inferno
5%
Mirage
4%
Vertigo
3%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
5
0
Nuke
43%
28
1
Ancient
0%
1
25
Overpass
60%
10
7
Inferno
38%
24
7
Mirage
54%
28
1
Vertigo
60%
15
9
Anubis
50%
8
3
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Nuke
100%
2
7
Ancient
44%
9
1
Overpass
75%
4
7
Inferno
33%
9
2
Mirage
50%
10
0
Vertigo
57%
7
1
Anubis
50%
2
8
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwlw
- wllwl
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs sYnck by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and sYnck, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was aNdu.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 0 out of 120 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were simke contributed 91 kills and nEMANHA contributed 77 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 43656 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
sYnck analytics
The team sYnck managed to secure 120 out of 120 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 16 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for sYnck were aNdu contributed 95 kills and eku contributed 91 kills. 43924 of total damage by sYnck could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, sYnck struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 60 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments