Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

17

4

0

86

1:1

4

1

6.9

+10%

11

11

3

0

71

4:2

2

0

6.2

-2%

14

11

2

+3

60

2:3

3

0

6.1

+2%

8

16

7

-8

80

3:2

2

0

5.6

-12%

12

15

2

-3

69

1:2

1

0

5.5

-8%

Total

62

70

18

-8

366

11:10

12

1

6.1

-2%

Sangal Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

13

3

+4

87

3:1

4

0

7.3

+10%

13

12

14

+1

95

2:1

3

0

6.7

+15%

15

12

5

+3

85

0:4

3

0

5.9

+11%

12

13

2

-1

78

4:3

4

0

5.9

-3%

13

12

1

+1

74

1:2

3

0

5.8

+8%

Total

70

62

25

+8

418

10:11

17

0

6.3

+8%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 10 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were aVN, who contributed 17 kills, and simke, who added 11 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6949 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sangal on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sangal, as they managed to secure 9 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sangal on Inferno included PANIX, who contributed 17 kills, and LNZ, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7941 total damage, Sangal couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date