Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

16

7

+4

89

0:1

7

0

6.9

+26%

19

20

2

-1

89

4:3

4

0

6.7

+6%

15

13

4

+2

66

0:4

5

2

6.2

0%

14

15

7

-1

77

4:3

2

0

5.9

-5%

12

15

2

-3

42

4:1

2

1

5.5

-20%

Total

80

79

22

+1

363

12:12

20

3

6.3

+2%

QUAZAR Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

17

5

+5

101

1:0

5

2

7.3

+17%

14

16

7

-2

77

2:2

4

0

5.9

+4%

14

17

3

-3

60

5:5

5

1

5.7

-21%

15

14

2

+1

57

1:3

3

1

5.7

+3%

12

18

4

-6

67

2:1

2

0

5.3

-6%

Total

77

82

21

-5

361

11:11

19

4

6.0

-1%

Teams advantage Anubis (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs QUAZAR by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were aVN, who contributed 20 kills, and simke, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8718 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


QUAZAR on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for QUAZAR, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for QUAZAR on Anubis included whisper, who contributed 22 kills, and gehji, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8655 total damage, QUAZAR couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, QUAZAR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date 
Stake-Other Starting