Ended
1
Full stats

0 Comments

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

10

3

+5

107

4:2

6

1

8.0

+32%

11

11

4

0

79

2:1

2

0

6.4

+4%

11

9

3

+2

74

0:0

3

0

6.4

+14%

12

12

3

0

79

2:4

3

0

5.9

-5%

4

8

2

-4

25

0:1

2

1

4.2

-36%

Total

53

50

15

+3

364

8:8

16

2

6.2

+2%

OG Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

10

5

+3

105

2:0

5

0

7.2

+25%

13

11

1

+2

77

2:0

3

0

6.4

+6%

12

10

4

+2

74

2:3

4

1

6.3

-1%

8

10

2

-2

51

2:1

2

0

5.3

-15%

3

12

5

-9

43

0:4

1

0

3.4

-40%

Total

49

53

17

-4

350

8:8

15

1

5.7

-5%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team

OG on Inferno Analysis

OG demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 8 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for OG on Inferno were Chr1zN, who contributed 13 kills, and Buzz, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 5592 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, OG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 8 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno included Cjoffo, who contributed 15 kills, and simke, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5831 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent OG from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date