0 Comments
226
230
35
-4
387
30:35
60
7
Inferno6.3
+4%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
56%
Nuke
52%
Inferno
33%
Overpass
28%
Vertigo
20%
Ancient
14%
Mirage
10%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
56%
18
3
Nuke
52%
33
3
Inferno
58%
26
7
Overpass
53%
17
9
Vertigo
50%
18
21
Ancient
0%
0
43
Mirage
52%
31
3
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
5
2
Nuke
0%
0
9
Inferno
25%
12
0
Overpass
25%
4
3
Vertigo
70%
10
1
Ancient
14%
7
5
Mirage
42%
12
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwww
- wllwl
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs NAVI Junior by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and NAVI Junior, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Anubis, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 34 out of 67 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Anubis. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 57 kills and simke contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25089 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NAVI Junior analytics
The team NAVI Junior managed to secure 33 out of 67 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NAVI Junior were Dem0N contributed 52 kills and UNBR0KEN contributed 45 kills. 24783 of total damage by NAVI Junior could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NAVI Junior struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments