0 Comments
70
49
23
+21
423
11:6
18
2
Anubis7.2
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
31.6107
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:54s
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
64%
Vertigo
46%
Ancient
27%
Anubis
25%
Overpass
24%
Inferno
4%
Mirage
4%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
64%
33
3
Vertigo
54%
26
14
Ancient
0%
0
65
Anubis
67%
52
0
Overpass
44%
27
30
Inferno
54%
24
14
Mirage
40%
35
15
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
3
4
Vertigo
100%
2
4
Ancient
27%
22
0
Anubis
42%
12
0
Overpass
20%
5
0
Inferno
50%
2
8
Mirage
36%
14
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwww
- lwlwl
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Lilmix by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and Lilmix, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was simke.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were simke contributed 15 kills and nEMANHA contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7183 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lilmix analytics
The team Lilmix managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lilmix were Brillo contributed 16 kills and ZYYX contributed 10 kills. 5744 of total damage by Lilmix could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lilmix struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments