0 Comments
140
109
27
+31
416
15:21
39
2
Nuke5.8
+13%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
88%
Vertigo
41%
Anubis
33%
Overpass
32%
Nuke
29%
Mirage
13%
Inferno
2%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
63
Vertigo
55%
22
28
Anubis
69%
36
1
Overpass
32%
25
27
Nuke
58%
38
3
Mirage
50%
40
6
Inferno
42%
26
6
Last 5 maps
Ancient
88%
8
2
Vertigo
14%
7
5
Anubis
36%
14
1
Overpass
0%
1
9
Nuke
29%
7
1
Mirage
63%
8
0
Inferno
40%
5
7
Last results
Past matches
- wwlww
- llwlw
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Lazer Cats by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and Lazer Cats, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was nEMANHA.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 26 out of 38 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were nEMANHA contributed 34 kills and brutmonster contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14745 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lazer Cats analytics
The team Lazer Cats managed to secure 12 out of 38 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lazer Cats were neiter contributed 24 kills and t0kk contributed 22 kills. 12239 of total damage by Lazer Cats could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lazer Cats struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments