Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

15

6

+8

83

3:2

4

1

7.0

+15%

27

19

1

+8

78

3:3

8

1

6.8

+21%

15

17

4

-2

65

3:1

3

0

5.9

-7%

17

22

4

-5

77

1:5

3

0

5.6

-9%

12

19

3

-7

65

2:5

2

0

4.9

-7%

Total

94

92

18

+2

368

12:16

20

2

6.1

+3%

Genk Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

17

1

+5

74

2:1

6

1

6.5

+1%

20

19

4

+1

70

3:1

6

0

5.9

+3%

18

18

3

0

75

2:2

5

0

5.8

0%

17

19

5

-2

65

3:3

3

0

5.6

-5%

14

21

5

-7

69

6:5

5

0

5.5

-4%

Total

91

94

18

-3

352

16:12

25

1

5.9

-1%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Genk by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 0 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were brutmonster, who contributed 23 kills, and aVN, who added 27 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10303 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Genk on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Genk, as they managed to secure 28 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Genk on Anubis included Ryu, who contributed 22 kills, and Askan, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9857 total damage, Genk couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Genk struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date