0 Comments
193
149
52
+44
436
27:22
52
4
Inferno6.4
+16%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
72%
Nuke
57%
Vertigo
56%
Inferno
47%
Mirage
47%
Overpass
35%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
72%
43
1
Nuke
57%
40
3
Vertigo
56%
25
27
Inferno
47%
30
7
Mirage
47%
43
6
Overpass
35%
26
29
Ancient
0%
0
66
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Illyrians by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and Illyrians, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was nEMANHA.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 32 out of 50 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were nEMANHA contributed 43 kills and aVN contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20577 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Illyrians analytics
The team Illyrians managed to secure 18 out of 50 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Illyrians were deb0 contributed 36 kills and cerber contributed 38 kills. 16612 of total damage by Illyrians could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Illyrians struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments