Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

30

20

5

+10

112

6:6

10

0

7.5

+23%

20

20

4

0

82

4:1

3

2

6.8

+4%

17

17

7

0

64

1:1

2

0

5.8

-3%

19

19

7

0

67

1:3

5

0

5.8

+3%

18

19

7

-1

61

2:4

3

0

5.6

-10%

Total

104

95

30

+9

386

14:15

23

2

6.3

+3%

HAVU Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

19

2

+3

73

4:1

5

1

6.6

+9%

21

20

4

+1

81

3:1

5

0

6.4

+10%

19

19

5

0

72

1:2

2

0

6.0

+13%

18

24

4

-6

72

6:7

5

0

5.5

0%

13

22

5

-9

58

1:3

2

0

4.8

-19%

Total

93

104

20

-11

356

15:14

19

1

5.9

+3%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were nEMANHA, who contributed 30 kills, and simke, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 11192 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HAVU on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HAVU on Anubis included ottoNd, who contributed 22 kills, and Jelo, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10331 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date