0 Comments
153
174
44
-21
359
22:25
40
4
Mirage5.7
-6%
173
155
48
+18
388
25:22
45
6
Mirage6.9
+6%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
64%
Ancient
54%
Mirage
20%
Anubis
16%
Vertigo
14%
Inferno
8%
Overpass
3%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
64%
28
5
Ancient
0%
0
69
Mirage
48%
33
20
Anubis
62%
63
0
Vertigo
47%
32
13
Inferno
58%
26
13
Overpass
50%
26
30
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
49
Ancient
54%
28
2
Mirage
68%
28
0
Anubis
46%
24
7
Vertigo
33%
12
24
Inferno
50%
8
20
Overpass
53%
15
10
Last results
Past matches
- wwwlw
- wwlwl
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Guild Eagles by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and Guild Eagles, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, and victory was secured by Guild Eagles. The MVP of this match was sinnopsyy.
Guild Eagles analytics
The team Guild Eagles secured 29 out of 48 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Guild Eagles were sinnopsyy contributed 44 kills and rigoN contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18368 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Guild Eagles held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 19 out of 48 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were nEMANHA contributed 38 kills and Cjoffo contributed 29 kills. 17281 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent Guild Eagles from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments