Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

8

6

+12

93

3:0

7

0

7.7

+39%

17

9

6

+8

79

2:0

4

1

7.1

+27%

17

12

3

+5

90

2:1

3

0

6.8

+18%

16

9

3

+7

85

2:1

3

0

6.6

+27%

14

9

3

+5

84

5:4

5

0

6.4

+18%

Total

84

47

21

+37

431

14:6

22

1

6.9

+26%

BRUTE Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

15

0

+1

79

0:0

4

1

6.8

+15%

12

17

0

-5

77

1:0

4

0

5.9

+2%

5

19

2

-14

47

1:2

0

0

4.2

-34%

8

17

4

-9

44

2:8

1

0

4.1

-12%

5

17

4

-12

50

2:4

1

0

4.0

-30%

Total

46

85

10

-39

298

6:14

10

1

5.0

-12%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs BRUTE by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were brutmonster, who contributed 20 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8630 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BRUTE on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for BRUTE, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BRUTE on Anubis included SiKO, who contributed 16 kills, and pal0o, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5952 total damage, BRUTE couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, BRUTE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date