0 Comments
75
95
18
-20
336
9:16
14
2
-8%
95
75
30
+20
400
16:9
22
2
+12%
Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Records Anubis
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:30s
HE damage (avg/round)
20.83.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:28s00:39s
HE damage (avg/round)
12.53.4
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:34s00:39s
Damage (total/round)
41673
Shots (total/round)
9716
Player score (round)
43851012
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Bad News Eagles by the Bo3.gg Team
Bad News Eagles on Anubis Analysis
Bad News Eagles demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Bad News Eagles on Anubis were juanflatroo, who contributed 21 kills, and SENER1, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10005 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Bad News Eagles held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included brutmonster, who contributed 18 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8390 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Bad News Eagles from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments