0 Comments
68
82
24
-14
341
12:10
19
1
-9%
Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:25s
Molotov kills on a map
21.0799
Percentage of headshots
39%15%
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
164.1
HE damage (avg/round)
13.83.4
HE damage (avg/round)
11.13.4
Shots (total/round)
8616
Shots (total/round)
8316
Multikill x-
4
Info
Map Analysis of Aurora Young Blud vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Aurora Young Blud on Inferno Analysis
Aurora Young Blud demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Aurora Young Blud on Inferno were gr1ks, who contributed 20 kills, and bluewhite, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8606 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Aurora Young Blud held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno included nEMANHA, who contributed 15 kills, and aVN, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7505 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Aurora Young Blud from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments