0 Comments
191
160
30
+31
393
32:19
47
5
Vertigo6.6
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
63%
Vertigo
63%
Ancient
62%
Nuke
22%
Inferno
11%
Dust II
7%
Mirage
5%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
20%
5
8
Vertigo
63%
8
7
Ancient
0%
3
16
Nuke
47%
15
1
Inferno
17%
23
3
Dust II
60%
10
3
Mirage
55%
33
0
Anubis
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Overpass
83%
6
2
Vertigo
0%
1
6
Ancient
62%
13
2
Nuke
25%
4
4
Inferno
28%
18
0
Dust II
53%
15
0
Mirage
60%
20
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- wwlll
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs allStars by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and allStars, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Mirage, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was aVN.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were aVN contributed 47 kills and Cjoffo contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20426 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
allStars analytics
The team allStars managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for allStars were isk contributed 23 kills and kritik contributed 33 kills. 17144 of total damage by allStars could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, allStars struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments