0 Comments
70
81
27
-11
366
10:11
17
2
Anubis5.8
0%
Teams advantage
Score
6.8
5.8
Anubis1
Win Rounds
13
8
Anubis5
Kills
81
70
Anubis11
Damage
8.74K
7.68K
Anubis1065
Economy
425.95K
395.75K
Anubis30200
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6107
Galil kills on a map
41.8161
Player score (round)
35101011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
67%
Anubis
60%
Overpass
W
50%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
67%
3
0
Anubis
60%
5
0
Overpass
0%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
4
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Overpass
50%
2
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlww
- lwlll
Info
Match analysis of Zero MarksMen vs We Global by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero MarksMen and We Global, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Zero MarksMen. The MVP of this match was mooseM.
Zero MarksMen analytics
The team Zero MarksMen secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero MarksMen were mooseM contributed 19 kills and drayza contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8741 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero MarksMen held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
We Global analytics
The team We Global managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for We Global were lo-fi contributed 14 kills and dOmOGatOr contributed 17 kills. 7676 of total damage by We Global could not prevent Zero MarksMen from securing the victory
On the defensive side, We Global struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments